Saturday, June 20, 2009

perspective

To what extent can we control who we are?

Some would say that who we are is completely under our control, and that we (and perhaps some God or equivalent) are the only people who can truly observe it. And that to know another person is impossible.

But if we define a personality as something that can't be observed, then what's the point? If I can't possibly know, then why should I care? What good does it do us to think so hard about ourselves except to inform our actions? We are what we do, what we say, what we present to the world. Nothing more. Anything else is just an exercise we perform that informs our actions. The only value in considering this is to understand how it works, that we might predict actions in the future. Stopping at 'knowing a person' is stupid. Knowing how a person works and thinks should be information to be used (for your gain or theirs or someone else's). 'Who we are' means 'what do people know about us'.

How, then, can we control the message? If who we are is what people see, then we can easily lose control of who we are. Telling lies, we can change who we are, but at the risk of being found out and losing credibility. Misunderstanding, rumour and malice can all change the story and we might not even know it. Left unattended, a false rumour becomes truth, and if that rumour reaches someone before you do, there might be no hope for you. Because like it or not, you are what people think you are, and if you don't like it, you have to do everything in your power to change it.

It does you no good to claim a high moral ground and pretend you don't care what people think. You do, and you should. So next time you want to take a look at yourself, try to do it from someone else's perspective.

1 comment:

  1. You study maths don't you?

    Something false doesn't become true, just because there exist people who don't understand the details, or if multiple people have (maybe even independently) produced invalid proofs.

    You're not what people think you are, or even what you'd like to believe you are. You're mixing opinions with reality.

    Sure, maybe it doesn't matter what's true, and it's important to take care of yourself by understanding how others see you.

    But you're more than just your reputation, whatever that happens to be at any point. What happened to your mathematician's healthy distrust of unjustified claims? :/

    If a rumour (which you find hurtful) reaches someone before you do, and you think it's false, show up and provide a counter example.

    ReplyDelete